EmailThis week we are running one of our video bootcamps in London.
This morning, to demonstrate live streaming, something that simply did not exist a few years ago, we just 'went live' from our training room at the Thomson Foundation.
Amazing.
Two weeks ago, I was at a meeting at IBM's Watson Project in NY. We started talking about live streaming, so instead of explaining it, I just did it.
Remarkable.
And so simple.
Not so long ago, going 'live' was incredibly complicated and expensive. It required sattelite uplinks or a microwave truck (if you were doing it locally). And it cost a fortune.
Now, anyone can 'go live' any time they want, from anywhere, and it's no more difficult than literally pushing a button.
Today, sort of to codify the fairly obvious, The New York Times printed a piece entitled
Live Streaming Breaks Through, and Cable News Has Much to Fear
Yeah....
Well, sure, cable news has much to fear. But I think every other cable channel has as much to fear, if not more.
It's fine to 'go live' from some news story and have a reporter (or citizen jouranlist) go live.
“I think we saw last week that Facebook Live could become the most intelligent cable news network ever built,” said Jonathan Klein, a former president of CNN, who now runs a digital media company called Tapp. With more than 1.65 billion users, he said, “Facebook effectively has one and a half billion news bureaus to capture news, and they’re capable of doing things that a cable news network could only dream of doing.”
Bleeding obvious (as we say in the UK).
And who really watches cable news anymore anyway?
No.
The really interesting disruption is going to be all the other stuff - in other words, the lifeblood of cable.. and broadcasting.
A few years ago, Lisa and I were at the Country Music Awards in Nashville (seriously), at the Bridgestone Arena.
ABC was broadcasting the event live.
There must have been 20,000 people in the audience. (I checked this on Google. Amazing what you can learn).
Of those 20,000 people, maybe 10,000 were holding up their iPhones or smart phones during the concert, recording video and taking stills, no doubt.
Now, those 10,000 people can also live stream the event.
Also at the Olympics
or The World Series
or Nascar
or pretty much any public event.
Oh yeah... and wars.
or riots.
But particularly live events that the networks (or cable) used to pay a lot for exclusive broadcast rights.
What are you going to do? Confiscate all iPhones? Good luck with that. Arrest people who are live streaming? Good luck with that also.
Nope.
Technology trumps all (sorry to use that verb).
And in this case, the live streaming genie is out of the bottle and there is no stuffing him or her back in again.
All live, all the time, from everything is going to be the new rule of thump.
But just like with Instagram for photos or Twitter for #140, whoever can aggregate and ordinate this coming tsunami of ive content is going to be the next big thing.
As for broadcasting live events.... well, radio did survive TV. But not by much.
Featured Courses
Recent Posts
No News Today — or tomorrow for that matter.
March 26, 2024
For most of human history, people lived in a world without news. The concept simply did not exist. The idea of news is really a 19th-century phenomenon, driven first by newspapers, and then by electronic media which brought us radio, then TV and now the web. Now, it seems, we are headed back to a world without news. Not because the technology is not there, but rather because, increasingly, people are no longer interested in news, at least in the way it is packaged now.
What TV News Could Be
February 26, 2024
When television was invented in the 1930s, no one knew what TV news was supposed to look like. The medium had never existed before, and so, like Gutenberg half a millennium, prior, the first creators of TV news had to fall back on a medium with which they were familiar, and that was radio.
What Is News? What Should it Be?
February 20, 2024
Maybe scary stories drive ratings… or maybe they don’t.