The New 30 Rock?
 

And Now.... Walmart TV

Posted July 31, 2018
Share To
 
 

It used to be that there were only three networks (or in the UK, one - The BBC).  

The reason for that was that there was a technological barrier to entry. You could not have a TV station (or network) unless you had access to the 'airwaves'. (Yes, TV signals used to be broadcast through the air!).  As the bandwidth was limited by the laws of physics, there was simply no room for additional TV signals, and as such, the access to the very small space was controlled by the government.

If you wanted to have a TV network or station... too bad. All gone.  

Those who owned those very limited spaces had total and untrammeled access to massive audiences. Whole countries watched - as they had little choice.

The advent of cable in the 1980's (or satellites), meant that new territory had been opened up. But it was a quickly claimed and settled as the 'old west' had been in America.  Soonn that too was 'owned' by the likes of Time/Warner or Comcast, and they were willing to lease space out at a price.  A cable channel today sells for over $1 billion.

But then came the Internet, and suddenly anycould could get into about 3.5 billion homes worldwide for free.  

This was going to have a big impact on conventional networks and cable channels - like making them worthless, but that is another story.

The first person to 'get' the change that web access wrought for TV and video was Reed Hastings, founder of Netflix. And of course, Netflix soared.  Today, it has a market cap of $149 billion. But nothing lasts forever, and it was not long before Jeff Bezos got into the game with Amazon video and TV offerings.  

Now comes Walmart.

Walmart TV, a direct competitor to Netflix (and everyone else).

And why not?

The interesting thing here, to me, is that it is pretty predictable that a lot of other people are going to get into this before it is over.  

I could, for example, see Nike getting its own channel. NikeTV.

Why should Nike bother to pay a fortune to buy advertising space on ESPN, when they can bypass ESPN entirely and have their own sports channel.

And, of course, if there was (or is it were?) a NikeTV, why not skip ads entirely and just surround the video content with click and buy for Nike products.

Sounds good to me.

 

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: