Casey Neistat, CNN, YouTube, Paramount, Fox, Edison
image courtesy Wiki Commons
 

Casey Neistat, CNN, YouTube & ....Thomas Edison

Posted January 26, 2018
Share To
 
 

A year ago, CNN bought YouTube sensation Casey Neistat's app and company, Beme for $25 million. 

The company didn't make any money, but Neistat had 5 million followers and CNN thought that taking in Neistat they could also capture Neistat's 5 million.

They were wrong.

None of Neistat's fans became CNN fans.

I could have told you that.

If they liked CNN, they would be watching CNN. They aren't. They are watching YouTube.

In any event, yesterday, CNN closed down Beme, fired its 22 employees, wrote down a loss of $20m invested in Beme, (plus the $25m purchase price) and parted ways with Neistat.

Said Neistat, 'they weren't getting what they wanted from me and I wasn't getting what I wanted from them'.

Fair enough.

Now, the Thomas Edison part.

(As you know, I love historical parallels, and this is a good one).

In 1915, the burgeoning movie business in America was split between two camps. One was what we would call the old school, East Coast Protestants businessmen. They were led by Thomas Edison, who held a lot of patents on the technology to make movies.

The other camp, we shall call, The Jews in Hollywood. These were people like Fox, Zuckor (a furrier who founded Paramount Pictures), Marcu Lowe (Metro Goldwyn Mayer), and so on.  They were the new guys - the Casey Neistats of their day.

Anyway, the battle came down to content.  The East Coast Anglo-Protestants were busy making 'morally uplifting and important' films on the East Coast.  The Jews on the West Coast were busy making movies people wanted to see.

By 1921, The West Coast Jews owned the industry. Their studios are still in existence today, remarkably - Paramount, Fox, MGM, Warner Brothers and so on.  The East Coast group vanished. Their last studio, the Edison owned Vitograph, closed in 1925.

What's the lesson here?

Give the people what they want.  

Neistat understands what a YouTube viewer is looking for. CNN does not.  

If you are a young videographer trying to break into the business, do NOT get a job at CNN. Do NOT try and sell your work to CNN. It's not going to fit their brand.  

The great advantage of the Video Revolution is that you don't need CNN, or anyone else to get your message out there.

The trick is just getting it out.

Every day. 

 

 

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: