Wikipedia / Tobias Klenze / CC-BY-SA 3.0 - Own work
 

Current.org: Glenn Greenwald wants NPR journalists ‘to speak like a normal human being’

Posted March 18, 2016
Share To
 
 

"I’d like NPR journalists to be freed, to be liberated to speak like a normal human being,” Glen Greenwald says in the Pub podcast from Current.org.

Greenwald is best known for his involvment in breaking the Ed Snowden story and publishing classified NSA documents, but he believes that in all cases it is the journalist's job to inform and protect the public. 

When NPR’s David Greene expressed disappointment in Morning Edition political commentator Cokie Roberts for her public denouncement of Donald Trump, Glenn Greenwald’s jaw dropped.

“Imagine calling yourself a journalist, and then — as you watch an authoritarian politician get closer to power by threatening and unleashing violence and stoking the ugliest impulses — denouncing not that politician, but rather other journalists who warn of the dangers,” he wrote on The Intercept, of which he is a founding editor.

Greenwald, who is most famous for helping to break the Edward Snowden leaks, is also a longtime critic of public media journalism, which he sees as chronically mealy-mouthed in the face of nefarious or duplicitous powers.

“I’d like NPR journalists to be freed, to be liberated to speak like a normal human being,” Greenwald told me on The Pub, arguing that NPR’s impartiality standards are needless at best and dangerous at worst.

This week on The Pub, Greenwald and I discuss that long-maintained criticism, his 2010 confrontation with NPR counterterrorism correspondent Dina Temple-Raston, how journalists use the word “torture,” and more.

Please subscribe to The Pub in iTunes or your favorite podcast app, and leave us a rating and a comment! That will help boost our search results and allow people to find the show more easily.

Read the article here, and let us know what you think in the comments section below!

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: