releases, legal issues, rights, video, TV
 

He Sued With His Boots On

Posted March 31, 2018
Share To
 
 

A recent exchange on the Mojocon Facebook page following a question about rights prompts me to write this cautionary tale.

Elizabeth Whitten asked the following question:

Hello
I've looked at a lot of resources and I can't find a reliable, definitive answer to a copyright question so I thought I'd post the question here:

I'm working on a video where I followed a cosplayer as she mad a Wonder Woman costume. I went to a bookstore and took a few short clips of some comic books, and I was wondering if it's alright to use them in the video?

If you are a member of TheVJ or you have taken one of our VJ bootcamps, you know that we take rights and relesases very very seriously. (If you are a member, take a look at our set of lessons on legal issues and rights).  

How seriously do you have to take relesases and use of other people's intellectual property?

EXTREMELY!

There are lots of rumors floating around the Internet and other places about things like the '10 second rule' or what I would call 'accidental use' - as in, oops, it just sort of slipped in there, who will notice?

It only takes one owner of IP to notice and you are on your way to some very serious and very expensive legal problems.

If you are a regular viewer of HGTV- House Hunters, for example, you will note that the producers always blurr out original art hanging on the walls of the homes they are exploring. This is not by accident! 

Many years ago, I produced a very successful series for TLC called Trauma,Life in the ER - real life emergency rooms.  We were incredibly cautious about releasing EVERYONE who appeared in the series.

Once, in Dallas, we shot a story in the ER there about a guy who had fallen off his motorcycle and hit a fire hydrant - bad result. The doctors called them 'donor-cycles' for obvious reasons.

We were our usual cautionary selves about releasing everyone.  When we could not get a release, we shot 'artistically, - or so we thought.

In the case of the guy who hit the fire hydrant at 40 mph (on his back), we shot him being wheeled in, covered in a cloth. All you could see were his shoes- really nice silver boots.

When the show aired, his family sued.  They said that the boots were unique to him, and that anyone who knew him could identify him right away.  Of course, we had no release.

We thought it was a ridiculous claim.

We were wrong.

We lost.

It cost us a lot.

So here's the lesson.

No release.

No appearance.

Period.

People, art, music.... boots.

 

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: