Novak Dokavic
Courtesy Wikicommons
 

Is This Really Necessary?

Posted February 16, 2022
Share To
 
 

I am a regular viewer of news on The BBC.

I think they have the best news programs (or should I say programmes) in the world. I like to start each day with BBC Breakfast and end each day (at least news-wise) with BBC News At 6.

Yesterday, their top news story was an interview with Novik Djokovic, the tennis player. Why one would make an interview with a tennis player the lead story on a day when it seemed war might break out in Europe over Ukraine is another story, but I am not the Managing Editor over there.

At any rate, as the lead story unfolded, the pre-recorded interview cut briefly to an extremely wide shot, no more than two seconds, but offering me and the viewers at home a unique behind-the-scenes look at how The BBC sets up and conducts an on-camera interview. Take a look:

Look at how incredibly complicated this setup is.

So many lights, so many reflectors, and light stands. So many people! It must have taken an hour or two just to set this thing up.

And here was the result that people saw on screen:

OK.

I mean, it looks fine.

I, personally, would not have put him in front of a window. This can lead to a problem with backlighting, but maybe they also went outside and gelled the windows for all I know.

Now, take a look at this:

This is an interview with Alan Hayes, a Florida state election official. It was shot on an iPhone (no tripod even), by Eric Mock, an MMJ with Spectrum News 1 in Florida.

No lights.

No light stands.

No reflectors.

No endless setup time.

No ‘crew’.

Just one very good journalist with a phone, working alone. You know the way a newspaper reporter would work with a pencil and pad, or a radio journalist would work with a tape recorder, or a photojournalist would work with a hand-held Leica.

Now seriously, you tell me. Do you see a difference?

Yes, there is a slight reflection off of Mr. Hayes’ head. But then again, half of Mr. Djokovic’s head disappears into the shadows — and that window hinge is a bit distracting. Picky, picky, picky I say.

My mentor in the TV business was a man named Fred Friendly. Now pretty much long forgotten, but he pretty much invented TV news. He produced a guy named Edward R. Murrow, also now largely forgotten. Fred took TV cameras out of the studio and into the field for the first time. No one had ever done that before.

In those days, a broadcast TV camera was the size of a refrigerator, and it required trucks to haul them around; inch thick cables to connect them; portable generators to power them, and blinding lights to make the images visible on TV.

Today, all it takes is an iPhone.

If Fred was alive, that’s what he would be doing now.

 

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: