Next... a fish tank in real time
 

The Daily Mail Does Not Understand Live Streaming Video

Posted November 22, 2016
Share To
 
 

The Daily Mail is a great British tabloid.

I read it every day.  Call me a Daily Male.  

It's not exactly the FT or the Wall Street Journal (to say the least) but when it comes to Tabloid stories, they know what they are doing.

When it comes to streaming video or video in general, they don't know what they are doing.

Just now, I noticed on FB that The Daily Mail was live streaming from Trump Tower  Needless to say, i 'tuned it', if that term is still valid in the world of Internet Video. I joined another 1600 people to see what The Daily Mail had to say.

And what they had to 'say' was... nothing.

See above.

It was like watching a security camera.

Hello, Daily Mail

Video, like text, needs content.

It needs a focus

It needs a story

And beyond that, if you are going to live stream, the whole point of live streaming is to open the door to interaction by viewers (or rather, viewsers - that would be the rest of us).

What is the matter with you?

You get print so well

You get video so badly!!!

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: