Bell Telephone, Picturephone, Skype, Facetiime, Worlds Fair
courtesy Wikicommons
 

The Video Phone - 1955

Posted January 23, 2018
Share To
 
 

I am old enough to remember the first time I saw a video phone.

It was at the 1965 World's Fair, in the Bell Telephone exhibit.

Of course, in those days, there was only Bell Telephone. 

There was no Verizon, no Comcast, no Vonage, no VOIP, and of course, no Internet. 

At the World's Fair, Bell Telephone was demonstrating the 'phone of the future' - the Picturephone.

Remarkably, you could make a phone call and actually see the person you were speaking with. 

The technology was already ten years old by the time Bell showed it in Flushing Meadows. But here's an old video (film at one time) that showed the initial release of the Picturephone in 1955, some sixty years ago.

The phone cost $5000 ($46,000 in today's money), and the folks at Bell thought it was more of a novelty item than anything else.  

Of course, today, you can Skype or Facetime yourself anywhere in the world, at any time, and for pretty much no cost.

The reason was the 'digital revolution' and its never-ending impact. The 1955 Bell Picturephone was analog (as was everything else) and aside from needing a giant cathode ray tube (two actually - one for the sender and one for the receiver), it required enormous bandwidth to transmit both picture and sound over twisted copper cables.

The move to analog cut the cost of transmitting digital information of any kind (but particularly video) to quite literally next to nothing.

In the 1950s, as Peter Thiel once noted, we were promised flying cars and all we got was 140 characters. That is not necessarily true. In the 1950s we were also promised picturephones, and we got them.  

The thing about tech is that when it is a promise it seems amazing and tantelizing. How quickly the amazing and tantalizing becomes the everyday and mundane.  

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: