Weather Channel, Facebook, Video, Revenue
We're not in Kansas anymore...
 

There's A Big Storm Headed For Facebook Videos

Posted May 23, 2018
Share To
 
 

There's a big storm heading for Facebook.

Founder, Mark Zuckerberg, fresh off of his apology tour at the EU is coming home to find a different kind of tsouris attacking his child.

The Weather Channel announced today that it was puling its video from Facebook. 

That is a big deal. The Weather Channel is a major player.  And the reason they gave for pulling the videos - 'no revenue'

In an incredibly blunt but remarkably honest assessment, Head of Global Content Neil Katz said:

“We went along for the ride every single step of the way,but we noticed, over the course of two years, that we were being paid in all types of currencies — followers, shares, views — that did not feel like money.”

No. 

You can't pay the rent with 'likes".

Katz noted that The Weather Channel was only making $28 per minute of video produced.  We all know what it costs to make a good video, even if you are just shooting with an iPhone, no one is going to make a living selling 3-mintue finished videos for $84.  

Is this an Emperor's New Clothes Moment for Facebook. Could be.  Certainly The Weather Channel is not alone.  How many other companies are pouring resources into creating video content for Facebook that simply is not paying off in much more than likes and shares?

“That was a wake-up call to let us know that though this was a fun adventure, it was not a business,” Katz said. “We’re not watching the cash register when these events happen, but later on, when we do the financial analysis, we want to understand if we were revenue-positive — and on TV and [nonsocial] digital, these are profitable events."

And, it's not as if The Weather Channel doesn't have people who want to watch their videos. It's just that they have to find a better platform for them - one that will pay them, as oppopsed to Mr. Zuckerberg. 

 

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: