Thomas Edison
 

Why Elon Musk Is Like Thomas Edison (when it comes to Twitter)

Posted March 24, 2023
Share To
 
 

So, billionaire industrial genius Elon Musk buys Twitter and immediately, 75% of the staff resign.

What happened?

Musk was brilliant at building real stuff – SpaceX – space ships that worked – watching the boosters land on their own was the stuff of science fiction. Tesla. The electric car that changed the entire car industry worldwide. The guy is clearly a genius. The Thomas Edison of our era (hold that thought for a minute this is going to get interesting).

But when it came to running Twitter – an unmitigated disaster.

Why?

Because making real things like space ships and cars is inherently a very different business from making Twitter – which is essentially making illusions and fantasies. It’s a completely different business and it requires a completely different mindset and never the twain shall meet.

People who live and work in a world of dreams do not do well in the world of real things. And the reverse is also true. When the two meet, there is a culture clash on the level of WW3.

But it is predictable.

In 1892, Thomas Edison (I told you) received a patent for his Kinetoscope- the world’s first real motion picture camera that used celluloid film.

Because he held the patents for the camera, Edison naturally opened the world’s first movie studio, Black Maria, in New Jersey to make the movies that the projectors would show.

The cameras and projectors were a smash success – Edison, like Musk, was great at making real stuff. The studio, on the other hand, was a first class disaster. The staff all quit. Edison was impossible to work with.

“The Black Maria was, according to the staff who worked there, a small and uncomfortable place to work. Edison employees W. K. Dickson and Jonathan Campbell coined the name—it reminded them of police Black Marias, (police vans, also known as “paddywagons”) of the time because they were also cramped, stuffy and a similar black color”

As a rule of thumb, there is a vast disconnect between the world of making real things and the world of making illusions. It almost never works.

The failure of Black Maria and Edison as a movie maker did not detract from his genius at going on to create phonographs, electric lights, voting machines and a raft of other inventions. There is creative and creative, but the two generally don’t mix.

You can read all about this in my new book, The Rise of the Mediaverse – coming soon.

 


Recent Posts

Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)


In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.


There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?


Share Page on: