EmailSeriously, what is wrong? Can you make better stuff than this? I think so, so why aren't you.
Local news, and a lot of video production in general, is in many ways stuck in a 20th Century mode of working. They have ridiculously high overhead costs, for a fairly small output.
Think about how the average local news station allocates it's resources. At the top line is the studio -- a huge office and shooting space that costs a lot to construct, rent, and operate. Additionally, inside these studios they have massive amounts of expensive equipment. Huge studio cameras, lights, audio equipment, edit suites, satellites and much more.
The next cost is personnel. At the top they have anchors or presenters who do nothing more (in most cases) than read what is on the teleprompter for a half hour or hour at a time and get paid millions of dollars. Next you have the large staff of reporters, camera people, sound people, editors, producers, and so on. With this large staff you would expect a lot of output, but in most cases the staff is divided into teams, or crews, that can only cover stories together. This leads you with a large staff but only 3 or 4 crews (if you're lucky) out in the field gathering news for broadcast.
You had to do things this way during that 20th Century because logistically there was no other way to do it. You needed a studio with a satellite in order to broadcast. Equipment was large and required specialization to operate it, like a huge camera or an edit machine. Now, however, technology has made it much easier to produce TV without big equipment and large crews. Now, all you need really is an iPhone, but even professional video cameras have decreased in size so much that one person can operate it and report on the story.
Think about if local newsrooms no longer used 4 person crews (some don't anymore and the results are amazing) and rather trained everyone in their newsroom to shoot, edit and tell a story in video. You could go from having 4 news gathering nodes in the local area to having as many as people you have. This would not only allow for news operations to gather more news, but also would drive down their costs.
Featured Courses
Recent Posts
The Future of News is NOT TikTok, It’s Netflix
December 18, 2024
Character-driven journalism is not new to newspapers, though it once was. It was once called The New Journalism in the 1960s — see Truman Capote or Tom Wolfe. Today it is industry standard. Why not take the Sopranos or Breaking Bad formula and marry it to TV journalism? (How many interviews have you seen in The Sopranos? How many Man on the Street soundbites have you seen in Breaking Bad?)
Good News is actually Good News
October 14, 2024
In a recent study by The Reuters Institute, 40% of Americans no longer watch or read the news at all. They find it too depressing. All doom and gloom.
The Future of News: TikTok or Netflix
September 09, 2024
There is a great deal of concern, well placed, that few people under the age of 30 watch TV news. Viewership of TV news in general has fallen off, so naturally, TV executives across the boards are searching for a solution. How to appeal to a demographic that spends most of their time on social media?